 Neutrino
telescopes

Telescope takes next step to high-energy
frontier
In April, while Lake Baikal in Siberia was iced over, the
neutrino telescope 1.1 km below the surface was successfully
upgraded with three additional strings. Renamed NT200+ it is
tailored to search for diffuse fluxes of cosmic neutrinos at
energies of peta-electron-volts.
Résumé
Le télescope du Baïkal va explorer de nouveaux territoires
Le télescope à neutrinos du lac Baïkal est un détecteur immergé
par environ 1.1 km de fond. Les opérations de maintenance et
d'amélioration ont lieu en février et mars, époque où le lac est
recouvert d'une épaisse couche de glace. Cette année, le télescope
existant, NT200, a été doté de trois lignes supplémentaires de tubes
photomultiplicateurs. Rebaptisé NT200+, le détecteur ainsi amélioré
recherchera des flux diffus de neutrinos cosmiques à des énergies de
l'ordre du péta-électron-volt.
On 9 April 2005, another sunny and bitterly cold day on the
southwest shore of Lake Baikal in Siberia, NT200+ was commissioned
as the successor to the neutrino telescope NT200. With an effective
volume of 10 million tonnes, NT200+ forms one of a trio of
large high-energy neutrino telescopes currently in operation,
together with Super-Kamiokande in Japan and the Antarctic Muon and
Neutrino Detector Array (AMANDA) at the South Pole.
Every year in February and March, the Baikal Neutrino Telescope
is hauled up close to the surface of the thick layer of ice that
covers the lake in winter for routine maintenance. Then, in early
April, in a race against the steadily warming environment, the ice
camp with all its containers and winches is dismantled and stored on
shore. The telescope is re-deployed to its operational depth of
1.1 km below the surface and switched back on for another year
of operation. With a stable ice cover on the lake lasting well into
April, nature has been kind this year to the 50 physicists and
technicians, who have struggled over two Siberian winters to
accomplish their ambitious programme to upgrade NT200.
The existing NT200 telescope consists of 192 glass spheres,
40 cm in diameter, each housing a 37 cm phototube. The
first, smaller stage of the telescope was commissioned in 1993, and
became the first stationary underwater Cherenkov telescope for
high-energy neutrinos in a natural environment (CERN Courier
September 1996 p24). The full array was completed in 1998 and has
been taking data ever since.
The glass spheres are arranged in pairs along eight vertical
strings that are attached to an umbrella-like frame at a depth of
1.1 km. The phototubes record the Cherenkov light emitted by
charged particles as they pass through the water. Three electrical
cables, 5 km long with seven wires each, connect NT200 to the
shore 3.5 km away and enable the array to be operated
throughout the year. Two of these cables were changed in 2004 and
2005. The reliability and performance of the telescope were also
improved during this period, with embedded high-performance PCs
installed underwater. In addition, new modems operating at
1 Mbit/s have increased the transfer rate to shore by two
orders of magnitude.
NT200 looks at the sky for sources of high-energy cosmic
neutrinos. Galactic candidates for high-energy sources include
supernova remnants and micro-quasars, while extragalactic sources
include active galactic nuclei and gamma-ray bursts. If individual
sources are too weak to produce an unambiguous directional signal,
the integrated neutrino flux from all sources might still produce a
detectable "diffuse signal". This flux could be identified by an
excess of particles at high energies above the background - which is
dominantly muons produced in the atmosphere above the detector, with
a small contribution from muons generated in the interactions of
atmospheric neutrinos.
The most important result of the first four years of NT200 comes
from a search for such a diffuse neutrino flux. It is based on a
principle that works only in media with small light scattering, such
as water. The idea is not only to watch the geometrical volume of
the detector, but also to look for bright events in the large volume
between the detector and the bottom of the lake. Because of the
small light scattering, wave fronts are preserved over 100 m or
more. This results in good pattern recognition for bright particle
cascades occurring far outside the geometrical volume, and it
enables distant high-energy cascades generated by neutrinos to be
distinguished from bright bremsstrahlung showers along the much more
frequent downward-going muons. No such events in excess of
background have been found.
This result can be transformed into a limit on the flux of cosmic
neutrinos, for a given spectral distribution. Assuming a reference
spectrum that falls with the inverse square of the neutrino energy,
four years of Baikal data yield the flux limit shown in figure 1.
For comparison, the limits obtained in one year with the much larger
AMANDA telescope are shown. Both experiments have entered new
territory and exclude several models for sources of cosmic
neutrinos.
It is this success that motivated the upgrade to NT200+. In the
new configuration, three 140 m strings with 12 photomultipliers
each are arranged at a radius of 100 m from NT200, so that they
surround most of the sensitive volume (figure 2). This enables a
much better determination of the shower vertex and dramatically
improves the energy resolution. As a result, the upgrade, which adds
only 36 photomultipliers to the existing 192, yields a fourfold rise
of the sensitivity at 10 PeV - certainly a cost-effective way to do
better physics.
The results from NT200 have demonstrated that a deep underwater
detector with an instrumented volume of 80 kt can reach an
effective volume of a few megatonnes at peta-electron-volt energies.
NT200+, with its moderate but cleverly arranged additional
instrumentation, will boost the effective volume to more than
10 Mt. If successful, this could become the prototype for an
even larger, sparsely instrumented detector for high energies.
• The Baikal Telescope is a joint Russian-German project, with
the Institute for Nuclear Research (INR) in Moscow, the Moscow State
University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, the
Irkutsk State University (all Russia) and DESY (Germany).

Author: Grigorij Vladimirovitch
Domogatsky, INR Moscow, and Ralf Wischnewski, DESY.
Article 18 of 21.

Previous
article | Next
article
|